Carrie

Director: Kimberly Pierce
Starring: Chloe Moretz, Julianne Moore, Ansel Elgort, Judy Greer, Portia Doubleday
Written by: Lawrence D. Cohen, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa (screenplay), Stephen King (novel)
Rated R for bloody violence, disturbing images, language and some sexual content

Originally published in the East Tennessean

Kimberly Pierce’s remake of the classic horror film “Carrie” isn’t exactly a bad film, but it’s one that’s so beholden to the original that it comes across as lazy and unnecessary.

The strengths of “Carrie” rest in the timelessness of its subject matter. Social outcast Carrie White is mercilessly bullied by her high school classmates. At home she has to contend with her abusive mother, whose warped and ill-informed Fundamentalist views on religion are extreme to say the least.

Carrie is empowered when she discovers that she has telekinesis, which revealed itself when she went through puberty. As Carrie cultivates her power, a few of her classmates scheme to humiliate her at prom. The consequences are devastating.

I’m not really one for comparing films, even when it comes to sequels and remakes. I like to judge a movie on its own merits and not those established by outside influences. However, I feel that comparisons to Brian De Palma’s 1976 adaptation of the Stephen King tale are impossible to avoid because the new film rarely ever attempts to step out of the exploding shadow of its predecessor.

Entire scenes, shots and sections of dialogue are lifted wholesale from the original film, so much so that it makes it feel less like homage and more like outright plagiarism. I understand it’s a remake, and many people prefer their classic tales to remain untouched, but I feel that the point of a remake is to offer new perspectives or update the story to make it more relatable to modern sensibilities.

Scenes between Chloe Moretz and Ansel Elgort
are surprisingly sweet. 

The only way that they bring the story into the present is with a minor plot point involving a cell phone, where the infamous shower scene is videoed and put up on YouTube. Other than that, the few changes that are made actually diminish the movie’s impact.

There seem to be fewer scenes about Carrie’s status as an outsider and more that focus on her tormentors. This would have been an interesting perspective had the care been taken to develop these characters and analyze why they are or aren’t conflicted with their feelings toward Carrie.

The book and original film do a great job of this, but in the new film you just get the same vapid teens in the same high school milieu that populate every other generic horror film. It feels inauthentic and you end up caring very little about what happens to the characters.

It’s a shame we see less of Carrie and her mother, Margaret, because the two main actresses are the best part of the movie. Chloe Grace Moretz does a great job of showing us just how demoralizing it can be to suffer from bullying every day, and how empowering it must feel to discover that she can fight back.

Although, honestly, I think that Moretz is a little too pretty to be completely believable as a pariah. Of course, that’s not a knock against her. It’s not her fault. You’d just think the make-up department would do more than ruffle her hair to show why most of the boys find her unattractive.

Carrie’s mother is a tricky role to pull off -- it could have easily devolved into over-the-top hysterics -- but Julianne Moore balances the benevolence with the malevolence very well. Margaret’s behavior is somewhat subdued compared to the earlier adaptations but, nonetheless, Moore is a fierce presence that gives the mostly inert movie some signs of life.

"You've got red on you."

Also, the final outburst of violence is disturbing for all the wrong reasons. It’s a little too slickly stylized and special-effects driven. It revels in the violence rather than portraying it as the tragedy that it is, and it just feels wrong. We’re supposed to regret the death that ensues when Carrie snaps, not cheer it on.

I’m always happy to see a film attempt to shed light on the issue of bullying. Most kids and teens who bully don’t realize the profound psychological effect their actions have to those on the receiving end.

While that message is there and clear in “Carrie,” unfortunately, it’s diluted by its broad characterizations, toned-down content and inability to make the film relevant to a modern audience. It looks even worse in the wake of last year’s excellent film “Chronicle” which is a loose re-imagining of “Carrie,” only from a male perspective.

Coming from the director of the thoughtful and wrenching “Boys Don’t Cry,” I was hoping this new version of “Carrie” would be a more grounded, gritty and emotional examination of teenage oppression, as opposed to the stylized and dreamy approach that De Palma took. Unfortunately, it seems that this version of “Carrie” was crafted more with a paycheck in mind than a message.

If you've not seen the original film or read the book, then you may enjoy this movie for the simple pleasures it offers. Even if much of it is copied from another movie, it’s still looking over the shoulder of a great piece of entertainment. Just keep in mind that there are better alternatives out there.

2.5 out of 5

Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol

Director: Brad Bird
Starring: Tom Cruise, Paula Patton, Simon Pegg, Jeremy Renner, Michael Nyqvist.
Written by: Josh Appelbaum,  Andre Nemec (Screenplay), Bruce Geller (TV series).
Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence.

I grew up on action movies. As a child with a hyper-active imagination, the intricacies of plot and acting didn’t matter much to me. I was just there to see the every-man action hero prevail over the seemingly insurmountable evil that stood before him. I craved fistfights, explosions, and one-liners, but most of all, I wanted to live through these icons and believe that I too was capable of something extraordinary.

"Did I leave the stove on?"

Regrettably, these films are an endangered species. Sure, we’ve got a superhero for every color of the rainbow now but it’s not always easy to relate to the tribulations of genius billionaires (both bat-clad and iron-suited alike) and adolescent web-heads, especially when their adventures rely so heavily on whimsical powers, supernatural villains and special effects.

Enter Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol, a refreshingly old-school action flick whose sole goal is to dazzle its audience, not through CG wizardry but through the humanity of its stars (and the insanity of Tom Cruise.) The tension is relentless, the set-pieces are thrilling, and the team dynamic among Cruise and his cohorts is compelling enough to make-up for the film’s lack of a memorable villain.

The story’s simplicity is mind-boggling: Dude's got nuclear launch codes. Stop dude with nuclear launch codes. That’s it. Oh, and then there’s Ghost Protocol: that ominous fine print that reads something like, “Should your mission be compromised, the government will disavow any knowledge of your existence.” You’ve probably heard something to that effect in numerous spy films before, but here the plot device is actually put into motion and brilliantly ups the stakes for our heroes by leaving them without back-up.

The Cruise Crew

Ethan Hunt (Cruise), the man that redefines the term “impossible,” is back with a team comprised of: the butt-kicking babe, Jane (Paula Patton), the wise-cracking hacker, Benji (Simon Pegg) and the unwitting “analyst,” Brandt (Jeremy Renner). Pay no heed to my back-of-the-box descriptions of these characters. They all defy the pitfalls of action-film clichés by being fully-developed people with conflicting feelings regarding the extreme situation they’ve been put in. Each one is personally invested in the mission beyond the world-ending consequences should they fail.

Unfortunately this attention to detail also makes it glaringly obvious that the antagonist, Kurt Hendricks (Michael Nyqvist), is as flat and docile as his name might imply. Arguably, the villain should be the most interesting character in an action film. The hero can be excused for lacking a defined personality because he/she acts as the avatar for the audience. The bad guy, however, should always act as the good guy’s MacGuffin -- driving them indefatigably towards their goal -- by taking a unique stance against something that is universally accepted as “good.”

A truly great villain can even evoke sympathy towards their plight by truly believing their actions are to the benefit of mankind. This is something that is hinted at throughout the film but, ultimately, it doesn't work. Hendricks harbors none of the characteristics of a great nemesis. He lacks menace. And his rationale for why he wants to destroy the world is never elaborated further than “life needs to start over sometimes.” It’s incredibly frustrating to see such a provocative philosophy go to waste in an otherwise top-notch thrill-ride.

See what I mean?

Though I will admit, said thrills do almost make up for this oversight. Director Brad Bird (making an undeniably impressive live-action debut) has streamlined the Mission: Impossible franchise into a breathless adrenaline generator; able to turn even the simplest of tasks -- such as hopping onto a meandering train cart -- into an opportunity to keep the viewer on edge. Bird and co. hop from set piece to set piece at a dizzying pace and compromises nothing in the process. There are at least three scenes here that rival the best that similar films have to offer.

The high point of high points is the much-hyped Burj Khalifa climb, where Cruise clambers up the side of the world’s tallest building. You might want to bring an inhaler, because it’s every bit as asthma-inducing as the ads will have you believe. The vertigo-afflicted among us have been warned.

Renner has exceptional balance

Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol is so much fun that it forced the kid in me to claw his way to the surface. I can imagine myself reenacting the insanity onscreen by climbing up trees, chasing down neighborhood kids on bicycles and fighting for an object that will “save the world.” For me, that’s the best praise I can give an action film. Sure, the plot isn’t anything original. And maybe the villain doesn’t live up to the standards set by the likes of Hans Gruber and the Terminator, but when you have a movie as expertly made as this, it doesn’t matter. Ghost Protocol ranks among the classics of the genre and is easily the best film in the M:I franchise

4.5 out of 5