Captain Phillips

Director: Paul Greengrass
Starring: Tom Hanks, Barkhad Abdi, Catherine Keener
Written by: Billy Ray (screenplay), Richard Phillips (based upon the book "A Captain's Duty: Somali Pirates, Navy SEALS, and Dangerous Days at Sea")
Rated PG-13 for sustained intense sequences of menace, some violence with bloody images, and for substance use

Originally published in the East Tennessean.

 “Captain Phillips” is a gripping true story that rises above other thrillers due to the humanity and moral complexity of its characters.

The movie is based on the 2009 hijacking of the merchant vessel Maersk Alabama by four Somali pirates. The ship’s captain, Richard Phillips, was taken hostage which prompted the United States Navy to initiate a rescue operation. 

The part of Phillips is played to magnificent effect by the one and only Tom Hanks, who reminds us again why he is one of Hollywood’s greatest treasures. 

The role is quite demanding, both physically and emotionally, and Hanks matches the varying character pitches perfectly. He effectively exudes confidence while also keeping a twinkle of terror and vulnerability in his eye. His powerful performance in the film’s final moments brought me to tears and I’m not ashamed to admit it.

Breakout star Barkhad Abdi is magnetic. 

Though Hanks is the protagonist, I’d argue that the real star of the film is newcomer Barkhad Abdi, who plays Muse, the leader of the Somali pirates. His menacing demeanor disguises a wounded soul who’s only there as a victim of circumstances beyond his control. Muse is not a man motivated by greed, he’s motivated by survival.

He’s much like Phillips in this way. They’re both just trying to do the job they have to do to get by. Their shared humanity gives them an uneasy, unspoken alliance. Each may be standing in the other’s way but there’s a mutual sense of respect and understanding.

Both know that this is a collision course that simply could not have been averted.

The film dares to make us feel compassion for the antagonists where other films typically do not. They’re more than just cardboard cutouts to take pot shots at, we become attached to them. These are real people with real lives. When the Navy finally comes in and begs for a peaceful resolution, you pray they can find one, even if in your gut you know it doesn’t exist.

In a routine Hollywood production, the end of this film would be a triumph; a celebration of the efficiency of the American military and American resolve. In “Captain Phillips” it’s a tragedy; the unintended consequences of the global economy. There are no heroes or villains here, only victims.

Coming from Paul Greengrass, who directed “United 93” and the last two-thirds of the Bourne trilogy, it’s no surprise that the film features an almost overwhelming attention to detail. In the beginning, the dedication to procedure and authenticity is a little off-putting; giving the film a sluggish pace, but his documentary-like approach is ultimately what grabs us and throws us into a seat on the ship with the captured crew.

This subtle way of building anticipation ensures that everyone who sees the film will be digging their

nails into the nearest armrest, leg, wrist or helpless pet they can find.

The climax is almost unbearably intense. Be ready for it. 

Film is a monumentally powerful medium, and it’s always encouraging to see people like Greengrass – along with screenwriter Billy Ray -- leverage their art for understanding. “Captain Phillips” is the kind of movie that helps us to fathom the human condition, and see the world in a way that’s just not as visible without the aid of film. If we as humans have to share a planet with one another, we should at least strive for perspective so that we can coexist as peacefully as possible.

I’m not sure if “Captain Phillips” will do anything to advance the human race in such a profound way, but it’s commendable that it even tries. It does, however, have the potential to at least start a few conversations and that’s a step in the right direction.

“Captain Phillips” is a terrific film because it uses its entertainment value as a thriller to force the viewer to ask questions about the characters and themselves, and to reexamine how one feels about difficult topics like terrorism, globalization and – the greatest mystery of all – our fellow man. It will hold you captive. 

4.5 out of 5

My Five-Star System

I will be utilizing the common five-star system with half star increments. I believe this system affords the most flexibility for gauging my opinion.

Let me break it down by rating and show you why:

This is heavy.

5 Stars: This denotes an absolute, must-see film; a complete mastery of craft on all accounts. A film like this truly envelops the viewer in a story and doesn't let them go, even after the credits roll. Obviously, these types of films are very rare, and we'll usually only see a dozen or so like this a year, but they're the reason you love the movies.

Examples: Back to the Future, Casablanca, The Godfather.

"I am above average."

4 Stars: This is the "almost, but-not-quite" category, which makes it sound worse than it is. A four-star review is still a recommendation, but it's lacking in some respects. Oftentimes, I'll award this to a film that has some minor pacing issues or if it feels like it would lose its kick on subsequent viewings.

Examples: The Avengers, Hunger Games series, Harry Potter series.

Yes, Cory. You most certainly are.

3 Stars: The three-star film is the average, easily-digestible effort that will probably be forgotten ten minutes after the credits roll. It's the kind of film that you don't mind watching on TBS one late afternoon when there's nothing else on. It's competently made, but doesn't strive for greatness. It exerts just enough energy for you to like it, nothing more. 

Examples: Comedies, Romantic Comedies, Cory Matthews. (Honestly, most movies fall into this category.)

However... this guy gets five stars.

2 Stars: This category is arguably the most frustrating to watch. You can tell that there were some great ideas, but few were executed well. It has a some redeeming qualities, and some people might enjoy the film, but overall you could do without seeing it. Many auto-pilot franchises fall into this category. See below

Examples: The Twilight Saga (any of them), Transformers (any of them), Expendables (you guessed it!)

Does anyone else think he looks like a weird, hairless cat-person?

1 Star: This is usually the result of a total lack of conviction from the cast and crew. This is the movie that you'd be reluctant to pick up out of the $5 bin at Walmart. One may be able to wring some entertainment out of this woeful exercise in futility by hosting a good heckling session but, otherwise, the film is a loss. Save your money

Examples: Most remakes, rehashes and reboots.

0 Stars: The great thing about my scale, as opposed to the one I'm used to using on Flixter, is that I can award no stars. It may pain me to do so but, sometimes, it's necessary. A 0-star film is so catastrophically horrible that it makes you doubt the art-form that you love. A film this bad can't even be enjoyed in a so-bad-it's-good way. The best thing for any film-lover to do is turn and run away from this unnatural disaster. Do NOT try this at home.

Examples: Manos: The Hands of Fate, The Happening, White Chicks 

Mark Wahlberg, pondering the future of his career while filming
"The Happening."

Disclaimer: My opinions, like all opinions, are subject to reconsideration. Furthermore, I'd like to point out that not all films are comparable. There may be a film that scored a 4.5 that I enjoy more than a 5. I'm here to judge the movie objectively on it's merits, not simply based on personal preference. Typically, films with a higher score are the films I enjoy more, but I have a few guilty pleasures just like everyone else. I could watch Tommy Boy on an endless loop, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's a perfect movie. I just want everyone to keep this in mind.